Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Channel 4's 100 Greatest albums
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 13:05, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Channel 4's 100 Greatest albums
This is just another arbitrary ranking/list of perceived music quality produced by a media outlet. There is no evidence that anyone finds this list to be authoritative and it will in all likelihood be forgotten in 5 years. youngamerican (ahoy hoy) 19:00, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
- Delete - What is next, Chrislk02s favorite songs, or i will create a channel and do that! Chris Kreider 19:02, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
- Delete - non-notable programme. There are a few more of these programmes floating around somewhere that may also need to be nominated. --tgheretford (talk) 19:32, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
-
- Comment - eek! There's a whole category to these 100 greatest shows from Channel 4 here: Category:100 Greatest... (Channel 4 list shows) --tgheretford (talk) 19:40, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
- Speedy delete as copyright violation - these lists are copyrighted, folks, and we can't reproduce them under fair use. Zetawoof(ΞΆ) 20:12, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
-
- Comment - in which case all the programmes within the category I said above need to be nominated a.s.a.p for copyvio. I can't do much myself at the moment because I have other commitments outside Wikipedia. --tgheretford (talk) 20:39, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
- Prevent broadcast. I find it annoying that I finish up watching them. They're each 3 hours long. -Splash - tk 22:28, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
- Delete and I would support the same for similar articles. In over 20 years of broadcasting, Channel 4 has produced some truly excellent, notable programmes. This is not one of them! Emeraude 23:10, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.