Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chance to chance

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete.--Húsönd 22:31, 25 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Chance to chance

Chance to chance (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

Not notable. In fact it doesn't even exist yet, and hasn't been published by the author's own admission. An "Importance to the [sic] Society" section has been added to the bottom since I added the proposed deletion template to the article before (which was then deleted by someone not signed in). However, even if it was a book of tremendous importance to society, it hasn't been published, it hasn't been reviewed by anyone (as far as I know), and I think that is article is merely a the author's attempt at publicity (it appears to be the sole reference to this book on the entire web). Therefore, I suggest deletion.Furby100 17:13, 20 November 2006 (UTC)

• Delete A seventh grader is writing a book (that he started last month) and hopes to publish it someday? Not even close to meeting WP:V or WP:N. -- Fan-1967 17:35, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
• delete unpublished works by high schoolers for sure. — brighterorange (talk) 18:37, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Ya, WP:NOT a crystal ball. -Royalguard11(Talk·Desk·Review Me!) 02:18, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
• Strong Delete - come back when it's published. Or do I mean 'if'? Self-plug. Pete Fenelon 01:04, 25 November 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.