Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chad Viggiano

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 01:24, 15 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Chad Viggiano

Chad Viggiano (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Article is on a contestant from the American TV show For Love of Money. Article has very little content, and subject is already treated in the TV series article. Article asserts no notability of the subject beyond his having been in the TV show. Suggest delete and redirect to the TV show, until such time as Chad Viggiano does something notable on his own. AllGloryToTheHypnotoad 00:22, 10 November 2007 (UTC)

Merge I am not opposed to an article on him... but in the current state, it is should be merged.Balloonman 00:33, 10 November 2007 (UTC)

• Delete and redirect. Personally, I don't think reality show contestants should ever get their own article unless they go on to obtain later notoriety. He has no notability outside the context of the show, and everything that needs to be said about him can therefore be covered in the For Love or Money article. —dustmite 01:44, 10 November 2007 (UTC)

I agree - this is sort of a parallel to how we don't typically have articles on crime victims - we cover everything within the article about the crime. AllGloryToTheHypnotoad 15:49, 10 November 2007 (UTC)

• Delete: No redirect. There isn't much to merge since the shows article doesn't really have much info on any other contestants. - Rjd0060 04:45, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Clubmarx 05:46, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
• Delete, as contestant doesn't seem to be notable outside of the show. VivioFateFan ^{(Talk, Sandbox)} 17:25, 10 November 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.