Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chad Schmidt

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Treat as a copyvio (i.e. only delete the versions that contain the violating material. Zzyzx11 (Talk) 12:44, 30 September 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Chad Schmidt

I'm just fixing an incorrectly formatted AfD nomination. No vote. --Metropolitan90 00:25, 24 September 2005 (UTC)

• Copyvio direct cut+paste of part of the movie's IMDB entry. It does credit IMDB as the source, but that isn't good enough. I would say, though, that as a film it probably deserves an article, even though it isn't out yet. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 00:35, 24 September 2005 (UTC)
• I agree. Delete the copyvio, and recreate the article again. Jaxl | talk 01:20, 24 September 2005 (UTC)
• Copyvio --Mysidia (talk) 05:06, 24 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete copyvio and recreate per Jaxl. ♥purplefeltangel ^(talk) ♥ ^(contribs) 17:37, 24 September 2005 (UTC)
• I rewrote the article as a stub and removed the copyvio material. Keep.Chick Bowen 21:17, 24 September 2005 (UTC)
• Chick Bowen's article is worth keeping and expanding. If copywright laws make retention of the original article in the history problematic, perhaps Chick Bowen's rewrite could be copied to the temp page and copied over when the original copyvio is deleted. Capitalistroadster 05:40, 26 September 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.