The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. W.marsh 02:45, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
All of three Google hits, two of which are from the same site. Doesn't seem notable. Daniel Case 04:10, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
Delete per nom. I tried some variations of the name, to see if the article title is simply a misspelling, but found nothing to verify the contents. Non-notable by my standards. --Kinu 05:08, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
Delete, non-notable. Royboycrashfan 09:58, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
Delete nn Prodegotalk 14:36, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
Delete non notable - • | Đܧ§§Ť | •T | C 21:56, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.