Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cerulean's Syndrome

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy delete g1, obvious hoax, or WP:SNOW if you prefer. NawlinWiki (talk) 21:52, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Cerulean's Syndrome

Cerulean's Syndrome (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

Almost assuredly a hoax. The only Google hit was the contribs page of the author. Sadly, no speedy-delete criteria exists for this, so off we go to AfD. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 19:51, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Delete -- for the above reasons.--ukexpat (talk) 19:54, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

• Speedy Delete -- I believe G1 covers obvious hoaxes, but I might be wrong. At any rate, thanks to User:Realkyhick, we can get rid of this nonsense once and for all, because it doesn't meet WP:V if for no other reason. Accounting4Taste:talk 19:58, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
• Delete made-up content, most likely a hoax Doc Strange (talk) 22:06, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
• Delete Hoaxes do not yet have a CSD criteria, so AfD was the way to go. Wildthing61476 (talk) 22:14, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
• Do not delete: this is a little known problem that GWSFPD is trying to publicize. Research being done at George Washington University, in conjunction with GWSFPD, is trying to learn more about this terrible disorder. —Preceding unsigned comment added by GWSFPD (talk • contribs) 22:17, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
  • Comment: Uh, yeah, right. No citations, no Google hits at all. We weren't born yesterday. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 05:53, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
• Delete - obvious hoax. If it weren't, there'd be cited references.--uɐɔlnʌɟoʞǝɹɐs 22:29, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
• Delete complete and absolute horseshit. Now hook me up with some of that crushed periwinkle. JuJube (talk) 22:57, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
• Speedy delete - a hoax or fringe theory. Cerulean is a shade of blue. Bearian'sBooties (talk) 03:10, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
  • More specifically, it's a Crayola crayon color. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 05:53, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
• Speedy delete. Not even a good joke. —Qit el-Remel (talk) 17:38, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
• Delete - But just because it isn't a speedy, that doesn't mean it must go to AFD. One could always PROD the article. -- Whpq (talk) 18:13, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

• I used to do that, but it's been my experience that when I PROD an obvious hoax that isn't somehow eligible for speedy, the PROD gets contested in short order and I've just wasted everyone's time. So I've started going straight to AfD to get it over with. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 18:46, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

• Delete Obvious hoax. Edward321 (talk) 06:00, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.