Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ceres Division

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete. Deathphoenix ʕ 02:03, 4 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Ceres Division

Not much context here. Does not appear to be notable to me based on a Google search so I thought I would bring up the discussion. -Big Smooth 19:13, 26 June 2006 (UTC)

• Comment. Some other Royal Naval Reserve units have separate articles, albeit better-written ones. TruthbringerToronto 19:36, 26 June 2006 (UTC)

Comment - The three live links in the RNR article don't have much (if any) info. In addition, this is the only "satellite" unit that has its own article. I am no expert on this subject but considering the lack of information in the RNR article itself, I am not sure a 35-person subdivision is notable. Perhaps the info in this article and the others could be merged to the RNR article, with a redirect added? -Big Smooth 20:04, 26 June 2006 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. Matthew Fenton [t/c] 19:58, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. --Nick Y. 01:10, 27 June 2006 (UTC)

What is everyone's problem about this article? If you know more about the Royal Naval Reserve than the original author, then edit it! The other RNR Training Units will edit their 'red links' in due course I am sure! For the record, Ceres Division is an "up and coming" part of the RNR and is the only representation of the RNR in Yorkshire.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.249.171.187 (talk • contribs)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.