Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Centre for Recent Drawing

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was if we follow the merge proposal by Mrsteviec, this article should be kept and the others merged into it. Johnleemk | Talk 12:49, 14 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Centre for Recent Drawing

Non-notable organization (club?) with a total of two Google hits. First being the auther's website. Author's bio (Andrew Hewish) is also up for deletion as non-notable. Ifnord 22:27, 8 January 2006 (UTC)

  • All of these were created today by the same person. I don't think any of them is notable, even together. Ifnord 22:48, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Merge I agree with Mrsteviec. Entries should be merged under Centre for Recent Drawing as it is an established small museum space of service educationally, with the local community and will list the kind of information Wiki was made for (see []Canadian Artists]] for example. The other entries are as a result of lack of user experience within Wikiworld. Doubts about it's bonafides should be directed to Phil Sawdon, Editor of 'Tracey' drawing journal, Deanna Petheridge at the Arnolfini or Mark Lewis at the London Metropolitan University - m.lewis@londonmet.ac.uk 82.35.49.241 23:36, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
  • As a new user, you may be unfamiliar with sockpuppets. I would advise reading it and pointing out that sockpuppet votes are discounted. Ifnord 23:42, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
  • the clumsiness of a new user! please see above for independent referees.
  • Every one is welcome and everyone was a new user once. Ifnord 01:19, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom. Stifle 01:34, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Merge or delete. --Terence Ong Talk 11:00, 9 January 2006 (UTC)

Keep. I wrote the original article. All vanity reference has been edited out and the offending articles edited out and merged. The entry has now been expanded and will expand, on what is an important informational source and developing discussion in drawing in current art practice. Hopefully the article now is a valuable contribution to the Wiki ethos and respects the five plliars.Controller 00:06, 10 January 2006 (UTC)


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.