Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cenetic Energy

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete as hoax or extremely nn per attempts to verify. Daniel Case 21:56, 17 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Cenetic Energy

Cenetic Energy (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

dosn't appear to be real and/or notable. The supposed inventor, Neil Turok is named in the first edits, but a google on him and Cenetic Energy give no hits. Cenetic Energy alone give hardly no non-wikipedia hits. The first editor got a remark on his/her talk page for posting nonsense.(User talk:Shakna) I have notified Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Physics to get more scientific assessments

• Delete — "energy that passes through atoms at a speed faster than the atom revolves", sounds like complete bollocks to me. — Laura Scudder ☎ 17:34, 17 July 2007 (UTC)

• Strong Delete Total nonsense. - superβεεcat  19:42, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
• Delete no references to this on science websites, or indeed anywhere else. Totnesmartin 20:30, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Looks like BS to me. As a check, I did a full-text search on the ArXiv pre-print server(where Turok and other physicists upload all their papers) and it found no instance of the word "cenetic". Other dead giveways that this is bunk include the random and unmotivated remarks on string/M-theory, the complete lack of references, and (relatedly) the unsubstantiated claim that "Cenetic Energy is no longer theory, over forty-two experiments have proven it right, except that it cannot explain why the neutron sometimes has a slight charge." -Joshua Davis 21:21, 17 July 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.