Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cemetary Gates

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was withdrawn by nominator --Ichiro 05:16, 6 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Cemetary Gates

Heavy metal cruft, riddled with POV violations. Seancdaug 08:35, 1 January 2006 (UTC)

  • Keep notable song by a very notable band. I tried to fix it up a bit. Cobra 09:08, 1 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Cleanup Other bands have pages dedicated to their singles, why not Pantera? The text should just keep to the facts though, at the moment it is fanboy material only. -- (aeropagitica) UK 09:10, 1 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep. Needs to be cleaned up, and a dab to the song by The Smiths, too. Cnwb 09:16, 1 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep. But deffo needs a dab to the song by The Smiths, as that song is even more reconisable.
  • Keep. But definitely needs a dab to the song by The Smiths, as that song is even more recognisable. Englishrose 12:07, 1 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep and cleanup per above. --Thephotoman 14:02, 1 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep. I pared it back even further and added info about its inclusion on a film soundtrack. I wasn't able to verify that the song was released as a single. If it was, we could strengthen the article by replacing the ad hoc table with a single infobox template (like Vision of Love). ×Meegs 14:19, 1 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep. Good stuff. We need more like this. -- JJay 22:55, 1 January 2006 (UTC)
  • 'Strong Keep POV violations can be fixed. It seems like a good post and doesn't seem like it should be deleted. --Chazz88 23:11, 1 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment The article has improved considerably since I first nominated it, and it's clear that I underestimated its notability. I withdraw my initial delete vote. – Seancdaug 23:35, 1 January 2006 (UTC)


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.