Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Celph Titled

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. W.marsh 13:44, 30 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Celph Titled

The last paragraph of this article reads: "Celph Titled has yet to release a solo album, but is slowly gaining popularity, especially since his appearance on track 15, "The Battle" off of Fort Minor's debut album The Rising Tied." Artists who are "slowly gaining popularity" do not meet WP:MUSIC. Neither do artists who have appeared on a single track of the debut album of a self-styled "supergroup" made up mainly of other, similar artists. I cannot see any evidence of notability here. At least one of these self-styled supergroups survived a no-consensus AfD and is of only marginal importance. Just zis Guy you know? 19:35, 18 June 2006 (UTC)

 AFD relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
 Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks, [ælfəks] 08:49, 24 June 2006 (UTC)

Actually, there's 112,000 Google hits for Celph Titled. AFD are not venues for you to tell grandiose lies. Please refrain from doing this. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.35.24.169 (talk • contribs)

    • Comment 539 unique hits. --Coredesat 22:03, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete as non-notable musical group. Also contradictory: first says hasn't released a solo album, then says released a solo CD in 1998? Or have I misunderstood? —Quarl (talk) 2006-06-24 09:27Z
  • Delete per above. -Hisako 06:28, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Don't Delete I agree that there is not much information at the moment, but in the coming months there will be more information unveiled. So if this page is deleted now, it will probably be put back up right away. Now, I don't know if that is enough to keep the page at the moment, but I thought I'd just throw my 2¢ in. Jay 02:44, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
  • That is pretty much the classic case for deletion. No information now = unverifiable from reliable secondary sources = delete. There is no deadline; if this artist becomes famous in future, we can cover them then. Just zis Guy you know? 06:45, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.