Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cell church

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep. Ifnord 15:06, 1 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Cell church

- Was entirely original research, is now just plain blanked. Someone defined the neologism "cell church" as a small closely knit group of worshippers who don't meet in real churches and then had a sort of manifesto on how cell churches can get more power. Cyde Weys 03:08, 24 February 2006 (UTC)

It seems to have improved a bit since the nomination. Now it's just a potential neologism, but considering that there's a large website using that very term linked in the EL section, and Google gives 103 000 hits, I don't think we can call it that, either. This article should probably be kept. fuddlemark (fuddle me!) 04:25, 24 February 2006 (UTC)

• Keep: 100k ghits on english google 1 result on google Define [1] 307 google groups. [2] Nothing on google news. [3] some hits on google local [4]. It seems to be a legit phrase. Don't forget: Notability is a guideline and not a policy. ---J.Smith 04:32, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. My understanding is that "cell church" or "cell system" refers to a plan for church growth invented by the S. Korean minister David Yonggi Cho, and since exported to other Christian groups worldwide; it involves having lay leaders conduct prayer and Bible studies in their homes to "feed" converts gained by social networking into the main church body. This is notable, and the article seems to be a start. Smerdis of Tlön 14:43, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
• Keep per fuddlemark. --Siva1979^{Talk to me} 15:05, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
• Weak keep per J.Smith. PJM 17:41, 25 February 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.