Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Celebrity worship

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was:Speedy deleted as patent nonsense. --InShaneee 02:25, 9 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Celebrity worship

Originally, I listed it as a speedy as db-nonsense. The contributor removed my speedy tag. So I'm putting it here. BigDT 01:04, 9 May 2006 (UTC)

• Speedy Delete as nominator BigDT 01:05, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy delete as a narcissistic essay. Aplomado ^talk 01:07, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete per nom. Man, this must be a slow morning in Wikiland. RGTraynor 01:17, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
• Whatever is faster than Speedy Delete, put me down for that. Fluit 01:19, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
• "Whatever is faster than Speedy Delete, put me down for that." Ditto! my god!--Nick Y. 01:23, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. This a topic which may well deserve coverage, but this is not that article. If someone has something coherent to write on the subject, it can be accomodated within Celebrity, unless it grows huge. --BrownHairedGirl 01:30, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy delete Consensus with Fluit and Nick Y. - Speedy delete and more —Larry V (talk) 02:11, 9 May 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.