Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Celebrity cricket matches

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy Delete - CSD G3 (Vandalism) by Orangemike (non-admin close). —Travis^talk 19:13, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Celebrity cricket matches

Celebrity cricket matches (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

I believe this is a hoax. I failed to find anything in a web search. The article contains no citations, and nonsense like "Bureaucrats Association for Red Tapism (India)". Many other edits of the author (Restname (talk · contribs)) appear to be vandalism (allegations of homosexuality and the like). Stephen Turner (Talk) 21:56, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Cricket-related deletion discussions.
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.
• Delete as hoax. Why do we have to AfD such obvious crap? It doesn't deserve five minutes, let alone five days. DarkAudit (talk) 22:13, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
• Delete: Meets CSD. This is a hoax that should be deleted on sight. Thanks, George D. Watson (Dendodge).Talk^{Help and assistance} 22:25, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
• Delete as hoax.--Hazillow (talk) 23:25, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
• Delete per above Surprising that it lasted this long. "Bureaucrats Association for Red Tapism" was an especially clever touch (bureaurcrats, red tape, get it? hardeharhar) Mandsford (talk) 00:16, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete per G3. Blatant hoaxes are now covered under the vandalism speedy tag. DarkAudit (talk) 15:51, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.