Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Celebrity Couples

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:27, 10 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Celebrity Couples

Fancruft. It'll be a horror to maintain for others, and really can be best covered on subjects' own article pages. — WCityMike ^(T | C)  ⇓ plz reply HERE  (why?) ⇓  03:35, 5 June 2006 (UTC)

See also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Hollywood celebrity couples. — Haeleth Talk 17:13, 5 June 2006 (UTC)

• Delete Brangelinacruft. SM247 03:36, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Wikipedia is not a celebrity gossip site Bwithh 03:38, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
• See, like, I like heard, ya know, that, like, Denise and Richie are, like, so over, I mean, it ended last week, so, ya know, the article can't keep up. Strong Delete. Wikipedia is not the Enquirer. Fan1967 03:43, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per...uhhh...the above nomination. --Bill (who is cool!) 03:44, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
• Keep This list is more current and easier to manage then List_of_Hollywood_celebrity_couples. Oddly that one made it through.  :-) Over 10,000 people search the major engines per month for information pertaining to Celebrity Couples. PortofDreams 03:40, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Wikipedia does not aim to replace the entire internet. It is OK if some searches lead people to sites other than this one, you know.  ;) — Haeleth Talk 17:07, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete both this and List of Hollywood celebrity couples--does the second one really need a separate nomination? Seattlenow 03:53, 5 June 2006 (UTC)

• Yes. Totally separate article. Fan1967 03:55, 5 June 2006 (UTC)

• I've nominated it, as several editors have now commented that both should be deleted. — Haeleth Talk 17:13, 5 June 2006 (UTC)

• Comment - although both are questionable, the Hollywood list is surely easier to maintain than this as it is somewhat more limited in scope. However, neither should survive so the difference is academic and only marginal. SM247 03:59, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, fancruft, unencyclopedic in nature. This is an encyclopedia not a fan site. --Terence Ong 06:19, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, celebrity gossip article. - Motor (talk) 10:29, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. — Haeleth Talk 17:07, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, at least until we get brought out by The Sun. -- 9cds^(talk) 23:33, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Ckessler 00:27, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. This is not a celebrity gossip dumping ground. Tachyon01 04:58, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete pointless, unencyclopedic, and impossible to maintain. Eluchil404 04:58, 7 June 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.