Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ceedo
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Keep. Fram 09:32, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Ceedo
Non-notable software. No substantial or multiple sources of non-trivial coverage. • Lawrence Cohen 21:11, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletions. —• Lawrence Cohen 21:12, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete fails WP:SOFT. No media coverage. ffm 16:54, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete A software application with limited use and subscribers.--Gavin Collins 20:58, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
- Keep Independent non trivial news reviews indicates notability. Over 100 hits on Google news archives. For instance:
- Delete promo of nn soft. Promo newspaper articles cost a dime a dozen. Mukadderat 23:58, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
- US News and World Reportd San Diego Union Tribune??!! Cheers, :) Dlohcierekim 11:37, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
-
-
- Er, yes, I was about to ask the same question. Those aren't trivial by any stretch. • Lawrence Cohen 12:29, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
-
- Changing to Keep as nominator. Good sourcing has been found. • Lawrence Cohen 12:30, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
- Keep and improve per Dlohcierekim, has been covered by multiple mainstream press publications, clearly notable. Melsaran (talk) 18:50, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
