Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cedric Chamouille

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 00:18, 7 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Cedric Chamouille

New Caledonian swimmer. I don't think his PBs are good enough to be notable. He is currently 30 yrs old, so he could theoretically be competitive if he was good enough. Here are his PBs

• 100 m freestyle: 52.02 (would be ranked 400+ in 2005;WR is 47.84 by Pieter van den Hoogenband)
• 200 m freestyle: 1:58.78 (about 325+ in 2005; WR is 1.44.06 by Ian Thorpe)
• 100 m butterfly: 58.27 (about 480+; WR is 50.40 by Ian Crocker)
• 200 m butterfly: 2:05.71 (about about 370+; WR is 1.53.93 by Michael Phelps)

The rankings are 50m Long course from www.swimnews.com . They list 25 swimmers on each ranking page, and if ten people have the same time, the next guy is 2nd, even though 10 guys are faster than him, so the ranking isn't as good as it might numerically seem.Blnguyen | Have your say!!! 04:11, 21 February 2006 (UTC)

• Keep pending confirmation of their notability. Bobby1011 04:19, 21 February 2006 (UTC)

• Comment - 37 google hits, when you include " ", then only 2, one of which is the wikipedia article.Blnguyen | Have your say!!! 04:43, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per Blnguyen. Doesn't seem notable or conclusively verifiable. --Kinu ^t/_c 05:39, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Oceania-related deletions. -- Capitalistroadster 09:44, 1 March 2006 (UTC)" Belatedly. Capitalistroadster 09:44, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, not notable. Proto||type 10:47, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, NN. feydey 17:43, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, not close enough to international standard. The "Pacific Games record" sounds good but as it's a redlink I don't see anything notable here. Deiz 19:48, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, non-notable, as per others Henrik 22:12, 1 March 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.