Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cecilia Aros Hunter

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 17:39, 8 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Cecilia Aros Hunter

Cecilia Aros Hunter (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Article has been tagged for cleanup/expansion since March. Nothing has happened in 7 months. --MikeVitale 17:28, 3 October 2007 (UTC)

• Delete per nom and fails WP:PROF. --Sc straker 20:10, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per Sc straker. IP198 20:15, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per my rationale for deleting her husband's article.--Sethacus 20:48, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletions. —David Eppstein 00:42, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
• Delete seems not to pass WP:PROF. Teaching is noble profession, but it doesn't automatically merit an article. Bfigura ^(talk) 01:14, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per nom, and above. Pete.Hurd 03:36, 4 October 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.