Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cave Clan

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Keep Eluchil404 00:29, 10 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Cave Clan

original research, apparent use of WP as webhost for advertising this group. PROD removed by anonymous poster without comment. Tychocat 10:01, 4 July 2006 (UTC)

  • Keep and add (more) references, etc. Have featured in Australian media on several occasions, doesn't appear to be advertising. JPD (talk) 11:13, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletions. -- JPD (talk) 11:13, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep International group with a 20-year history and a glossy magazine which details their activities. Notable enough. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 11:41, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep, needs cleanup. Notable group. --Coredesat talk. o.o;; 12:46, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep -- Longhair 18:46, 4 July 2006 (UTC)`
  • Keep per above + good to have the occasional article on Australia. Comment about prod removal is completely irrelevant since this was seemingly prodded in error. --JJay 00:31, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep. 18 mentions in the Australian media for this group so seem verifiable enough. Capitalistroadster 01:39, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep, Australia-wide phenomenon with long history and large membership and plenty of media attention. —Pengo 06:28, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep, as per Pengo above. --Roisterer 11:21, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep. Sarah Ewart (Talk) 06:43, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep. seems a valid reference regarding the Urban Exploration group Gonzoxl5
Just for reference, the above comment is by IP 84.70.151.225 and at this point in time the en.Wikipedia dosn't seem to have an editor Gonzoxl5.--blue520 12:14, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.