Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cattle Health Initiative
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Withdrawn by nom. — iridescent 19:05, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Cattle Health Initiative
If ever there was an "indescernable or unclassifiable topic", this is it. I'm not at all sure what this is, but I'm sure it doesn't belong here. — iridescent 22:24, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
NOTE This article was significantly rewritten and documented after the AfD -- it was a hopeless mess when nominated. --Kevin Murray (talk) 23:19, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
Strong delete No context, but probably not quite enough for a speedy. I'd say this is most likely the work of a confused n00b who doesn't know that much about the project yet, but still, this page is just so lacking that it should probably just be deleted. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 22:33, 3 May 2008 (UTC)- Keep per rewrite, looks to be a somewhat notable organization with a few reliable sources. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 23:12, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
- Weak Keep - Somewhat low importance subject, however it is not entirely without hope, a rewrite by an experienced editor should do the trick. -[[Ryan]] (me) (talk) 23:03, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
- Keep I've worked a bit on this and in an hour, been able to document enough to meet the minimum standars of WP:N. We have a very strong verifiable refences in the DEFRA site, and enough tangential discussion in farm related journals to demonstrate practical notability. It would be grea tot get some vets to supply information from hard sources. Cheers! --Kevin Murray (talk) 23:18, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.