Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cats on fire

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete per lack of reliable sources to establish notability. Eluchil404 18:53, 13 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Cats on fire

Cats on fire (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Not sure if this band fails notability, but I suspect they do. The only sources given are tweepop.net, allmusic, a blog, and (of course!) their own Myspace. I think that still fails WP:RS. They are currently "signed to" a redlink. I'd be happy to see this come out as a "keep", though, provided independent sources are added to this article. AllGloryToTheHypnotoad 01:08, 6 August 2007 (UTC)

• Delete Nothing here truly meets WP:MUSIC as I see it. fuzzy510 01:50, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
• Keep Is AllMusic not a good external source? I have received the impression from my observations and from others that it's a good source. I'm not saying that a link on AllMusic is automatic notability; it isn't. That's just Point #1. My second point is that it's a Finnish band; and from my experience, foreign bands are considerably hard to find information about unless they're REALLY well known, like Lacuna Coil, System Of A Down, and Rammstein. At the moment this band does not appear to be THAT notable, however I'm thinking it could become notable enough, should it get the necessary cleanup it needs. -WarthogDemon 22:12, 6 August 2007 (UTC)

Allmusic.com accepts user-submitted information, doesn't it? does that make it as good an external source as a professional magazine? I admit the band could still be notable, and I have nothing against Finland; I just wonder if anyone saying "aw, they're totally notable" will add the links to the article before this AfD closes. AllGloryToTheHypnotoad 01:32, 7 August 2007 (UTC)

• Comment - Point taken with AllMusic.com, however as I said I'm not saying Keep just because they're on that site. If Allmusic were the only source on here, my vote would've been the opposite. -WarthogDemon 23:05, 7 August 2007 (UTC)

• Week keep; 5 minutes of straight-forward research says they're sufficiently notable. --xDanielx^Talk 22:42, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Comment Did that "5 minutes of straight-forward research" supply anything to be added to the article or presented here such that others might agree or disagree? It would be most helpful, if you found any encyclopedic information, if you added it to the article. — Scientizzle 18:28, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
• Weak Keep per xDanielx. Mathmo ^Talk 04:02, 9 August 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.