Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Castle Hill Middle School 127

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus, defaulting to keep. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 05:17, 9 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Castle Hill Middle School 127

Castle Hill Middle School 127 (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Middle School with no claim to notability. Ridernyc (talk) 19:47, 26 November 2007 (UTC)

  • Delete per nom Rackabello (talk) 19:49, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete as nn. Tonywalton  | Talk 22:53, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 17:40, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep - this school is subject to a notable project for dealing with cultural diversity, important enough to be reported by the New York Times. TerriersFan 21:34, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletions. -- DoubleBlue (Talk) 23:58, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep Coverage by New York Times of a school of this type is strong evidence of notability. Alansohn 04:35, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep - Most middle schools are not notable enough for their own article, but in this case coverage in a national/state international newspaper (I class the New York Times as that as despite the name it is distributed internationally and has large audience outside New York) is strong evidence of notability. Camaron1 | Chris (talk) 18:09, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
    • The New York Times is an international newspaper of course, but only some sections of it, not the local section, where this article comes from. This is a Secret account 00:20, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete A small mention in a large newspaper doesnt seem to merit an article. Twenty Years 15:14, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep if the New York Times can find space for it in their publication, so can we. This is a school after all. Coccyx Bloccyx 18:28, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep notability is established. Noroton (talk) 02:01, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete the source doesn't indicate notabilty, it's the local section of the New York Times of a New York city school. This is a Secret account 04:00, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep Meets WP:N standard for notability, which is what we generally are talking about when we mention "notability". Noroton (talk) 01:23, 8 December 2007 (UTC)


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.