Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cassius Taylor

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus, although this seems more due to participation than royalty's actual intrinsic notability or lack of it, as I just closed an AfD on the one before him which had more participation and consequently a 'keep' consensus. --Sam Blanning^(talk) 18:11, 20 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Cassius Taylor

As per my comments on Wikipedia talk:Notability (royalty) no assertion of notability has been given here. This just seems like annothe royal-cruft article about some non notable person. Matthew Fenton (Talk | Contribs) 17:11, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

• Keep With the cluster of Nobility all nominated together, a single discussion might have sufficed. WilyD 20:30, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
• Not so notable outside of the family context. 27th? Merge with Lady Helen Taylor you'll sleep sounder Ohconfucius 13:50, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete zero gnews hits, zero gbooks hits. Being umptieth in the line for the throne is not, not, not, notable. Unsourced, unreferenced, unwanted. WP:NOT Hello. Angus McLellan (Talk) 17:44, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
• Keep as per the other article nominated by the same user -- Roleplayer 02:34, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
• Keep Astrotrain 14:25, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom Mad Jack 06:22, 16 August 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.