Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Casey and dew

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Sango123 01:38, 21 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Casey and dew

Although there are claims of notability, there are only 16 Google hits, no alexa ranking, and no hits in Google News. User:Zoe|^(talk) 16:40, 14 June 2006 (UTC)

• www.nashvillescene.com/Stories/News/2005/12/22/Child_Porn_Hits_Nashville/index.shtml is one major media news story on the pair.

• www.eb15.com the forums on this site include many talks about the pair

• forum1.neworleans.com/viewtopic.php?p=10988&sid=8c33140c990bac6eb760a497b07068c5 -this website has discussed the pair

• www.archive.org this website has much information on the history of the website

I'm currently researching Alexa as it appears to be offline for traffic rankings. However they were listed there for a while in the past, if they aren't now it must have been deleted. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Foreveryoung2 (talk • contribs)

this is very disturbing. The nashvillescene article is from 2005, and indicates that "Dew" is 13 years old. Do we want an article about a pederasty website? User:Zoe|^(talk) 18:43, 14 June 2006 (UTC)

http://www.alexa.com/data/details/main?q=www.caseyanddew.tv&url=www.caseyanddew.tv

Here is the link to the traffic rank. Looks like they cleared the information out but it is still listed. Now your reaction there is exactly the reason to have this article. The website was not anything like what the article claimed. Those lies were made up by Justin Berry to discredit the pair. This was a G rated website about being gay, nothing to do with pornography. Take a look at the sample google videos to get a better idea. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 166.172.34.206 (talk • contribs)

Please sign your posts with four tildes - ~~~~. I will reword my question. Do we want to have an article about an adult man and the 13 year old boy he is having sex with? And the link you provide, which I already checked, still shows no traffic rank. User:Zoe|^(talk) 18:48, 14 June 2006 (UTC)

Again that is just a lie, dont you understand the point here. That was a made up story which was never verified and disputed by everyone including the child. That is the reason this article needs to exist. You can't just take everything the media says at face value 166.172.34.206 19:33, 14 June 2006 (UTC)Foreveryoung

You're the one who used the news article as supposed proof of the relevance of this article, and now you're trying to claim that the news article you provided the link for is a lie. You can't have it both ways. User:Zoe|^(talk) 20:23, 14 June 2006 (UTC)

The Nashville Scene article does not assert that Casey and Dew had sex. It says that Greg Mitchel says that he was having sex with the boy. The closest it comes is "It was not always overtly sexual..." which is far too weasely. Kotepho 01:28, 15 June 2006 (UTC)

• Hastily delete. This is non-notable and not encyclopedia-worthy content. JDoorjam Talk 23:58, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
• Weak keep Only one source, would like more. Kotepho 01:28, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
  • You haven't explained how it meets our notability guidelines. User:Zoe|^(talk) 01:48, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Can't see how this meets WP:WEB. Capitalistroadster 02:58, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Good grief, I never thought I would say this but: non-notable rapist and pedophile. Unless something else happens that makes this stick out like a Ted Bundy, no reason to keep. Yanksox 04:16, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, protect against recreation, and forget this ever existed as soon as possible. --InShaneee 15:31, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Can't see the point of having this. Matthew Brown (Morven) (T:C) 16:14, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per Morven. Ral315 (talk) 14:57, 16 June 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.