Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Casalinhos de Alfaiata

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:15, 8 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Casalinhos de Alfaiata

Casalinhos de Alfaiata (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

This is an entirely unreferenced article describing an apparently non-notable location John254 00:45, 3 December 2006 (UTC)

  • Delete Non-notable place of local interest. -Nv8200p talk 01:08, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep. Towns and cities are always notable, and a famous professional cyclist lived there. --TruthbringerToronto (Talk | contribs) 01:22, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
    • Comment -- If this article does concern a city or town, it should state that fact. Currently, the article describes Casalinhos de Alfaiata as a "place (terra)". Also, the article should include references; an entirely unreferenced article is inconsistent with Wikipedia:Verifiability. John254 01:41, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
  • I think that any town probably does warrant an article if someone's willing to write it and if it's verifiable. Of course, this at the moment is not verified and isn't really even about the town. Still, the article is only a couple of hours old; there's no reason to rush to delete it. Keep pending verification - Che Nuevara 06:51, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
So do I. Where's my article?--Dmz5 07:19, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
It's here. (Only kidding) ArmAndLeg 21:38, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
  • The distinction terra/parish/municipality makes it seem like this "place" is really just a subdivision or at best a neighborhood....--Dmz5 07:20, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep. Looks like a large, separate urbanization. Whatever you call it, it's notable. --AlexWCovington (talk) 08:52, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment. The place is notable enough to have its name shown on the maps from MSN and Google. --TruthbringerToronto (Talk | contribs) 09:29, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep. It seems notable enough according to Google and the link from Joaquim Agostinho adds some degree of notability. 0L1 Talk Contribs 11:16 3/12/2006 (UTC)
  • Keep It's a city after all.
  • Keep it's a real city. TSO1D 19:19, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep because for whatever reason wikipedia has decided that all cities should be included. ArmAndLeg 21:38, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep Cities/towns/villages are all notable. --Oakshade 08:12, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.