Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cartalina Fixaw

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. – ABCD 01:08, 15 Apr 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Cartalina Fixaw

Seems like a bogus entry, and this doesn't quite fit the speedy criteria. – ClockworkSoul 02:31, 9 Apr 2005 (UTC)

• Delete vanity, non-notable. 0 Google hits. Very close to patent nonsense. --InShaneee 02:33, 9 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Possible hoax. Definitely not notable. If real, then vanity. Too many short sentences. I hate that. Delete. -- 8^D ^gab 03:15, 2005 Apr 9 (UTC)
• Delete unless somehow verified. --Fuzzball! (talk) 05:08, 9 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Delete fails the Google test. Andrew pmk 06:00, 9 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Delete either vanity or hoax Dsmdgold 10:42, Apr 9, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete as hoax. Can't really be vanity if subject is long dead. Still doesn't Google, and the story is pretty wacky... so wacky that if it indeed were true she'd have at least a certain amount of fame by now. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 13:35, Apr 9, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. as per Starblind. P Ingerson 14:14, 9 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Delete as hoax. Except for Clockwork adding the VfD, all edits appear to be from two addresses on the same ISP. One created the article, the other "vandalized" it, then the first immediately came back and reverted it. -- Gyrofrog (talk) 19:33, 9 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. This sounds like one of those stories we get in class for lab safety. I wouldn't be surprised if that's the actual basis of this article. Tim Rhymeless (Er...let's shimmy) 01:29, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.