Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cart00ney (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 10:16, 26 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Cart00ney

Cart00ney (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

There are no reliable sources on this, so it fails Wikipedia:Attribution. A previous AfD from a year ago ended in No Consensus; apparently at that time reliable sources weren't needed, but they are now Xyzzyplugh 13:38, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

• Delete as a neologism. It fails the "n-year test" for any n > 0. :) YechielMan 18:11, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
• Delete - per nominator: no reliable sources, no article, no assertion of notability. Dicdef which has already been transwikiied. Moreschi ^{Request a recording?} 18:41, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.