Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cars 2 (film)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 04:10, 31 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Cars 2 (film)

Cars 2 (film) (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Appears to be a case of WP:CRYSTAL ("Wikipedia is not a crystal ball"). User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 03:00, 26 July 2007 (UTC)

  • Delete, Article is pure speculation. Out of three sources one link is broken, the other is about how cars influence culture and the last is a blog. Peregrinebee 15:36, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Comment I was too lazy to read the whole article, but please can we not have articles on films to be released four years from now? The centralized discussion on applying WP:CRYSTAL to unreleased films finds another useful application. Shalom Hello 03:02, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete per WP:CRYSTAL. "According to a very reliable anonymous source" doesn't inspire much confidence (or meet WP:RS). -- MarcoTolo 03:04, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete, crystal ball-ism. Realkyhick 03:16, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Strong delete, fails WP:RS and is a total WP:CRYSTAL job. Whoever created it needs to chill for a while. Ten Pound Hammer • (((Broken clamshells • Otter chirps))) 03:21, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Let's say Do Not Enter to this article and put up a one way sign to Delete-land along the WP:CRYSTAL highway Rackabello 03:30, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Strong delete per WP:CRYSTAL and lack of verifiable non-blog sources per WP:CITE. SpikeJones 04:25, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom and everyone else. The only source is a blog post, and the rest looks copied from the article on the first film. Maxamegalon2000 06:04, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletions. -- the wub "?!" 10:18, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Strong Delete. How can an anonymous source be reliable? This article has no place yet. ClEeFy 12:19, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. This isn't even crystalballery, this is just a bad case of WP:NFT. --Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 00:44, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete, I'd probably say delete for now. At least until there is a official announcement from Pixar. Mrx9898 08:13, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete - Definite WP:CRYSTAL case, plus no reliable sources. RaNdOm26 11:09, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.