Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carr Creek elementary school

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --Coredesat 04:48, 7 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Carr Creek elementary school

Carr Creek elementary school (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Not notable Epbr123 14:21, 27 March 2007 (UTC)

  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletions. -- Noroton 16:08, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
  • weak keep The school seems to be notably effective in science--at least I think that's what I think it's trying to say. I haven't seen an article before suggesting notability of the basis of what conferences the teachers went to. Notable teachers do make a school notable, and this might be a good direction for those writing articles on the subject to try--although I don't think this particular instance is sufficient for that. If sources are supplied, I'd accept this article. DGG 23:56, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
  • Weak Delete pending verification and attribution of sufficient awards. --Butseriouslyfolks 01:48, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached
 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, WjBscribe 01:00, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Weak delete echoing User:Butseriouslyfolks. They assert notability, but they don't have links. Change my mind. --Dennisthe2 02:42, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Redirect to Knott County, Kentucky. We already have a guideline in place for this, WP:LOCAL, we do not need to be repeatedly flooding AFD with these. Yamaguchi先生 03:22, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Has not be able to verify notibility (which was extremely weak to begin with).--Dacium 04:17, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
  • DeleteRedirect (I missed Yamaguchi's comments until after I hit the edit button. I strongly agree with him. Best solution) no one but us is paying attention to it. It's ripe for vandalism. Someone searching for information on the school would probably be better satisfied through a search engine than by looking at this article. Not even a deletion discussion has attracted any local supporters. Noroton 04:42, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete: Unverified information, non-notable school. Yeah, it has won awards, but so have dozens of other schools in the state. Seicer (talk) (contribs) 06:15, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep nomination falls squarely into Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions  ALKIVAR™ ☢ 06:28, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
    • Why is that a reason to keep?! Its obvious why it isn't notable. Epbr123 10:13, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep I am somewhat inclusionist about schools and so would tend towards keep in any case, however imo passes notability tests. Springnuts 06:36, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete or Redirect Non-notable school. TJ Spyke 07:34, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete or Redirect As per nom. Dalejenkins 08:16, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete non-notable school, fails WP:ATT, no sourcing at all. Odds that the article will be improved are near to zero, given that it is the sole Wikipedia activity of the creator, and that much nearly five months ago. (Quite aside from anything else, I'm unimpressed with the use of "Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions," an essay representing the opinion of its authors which is neither policy, guideline nor consensus, as a citation.) RGTraynor 15:30, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Weak Delete Conceivably it is notable, but there is no source whatever to demonstrate it. If they have been doing as well as claimed, here should be something. DGG 02:35, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Weak Keep Requires sourcing, but passes notability. Kukini hablame aqui 00:38, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.