Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carolyn Jourdan (2nd nomination)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete, yet again. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 08:37, 14 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Carolyn Jourdan (2nd nomination)

Carolyn Jourdan (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

Page was deleted on 5 December after nomination on grounds of "biographical article on an unreleased book, failed on criteria for notability for people or for book". Page was recreated 7 December, and edited through 8 December, but without addresing the original reasons for delete, i.e. book is still unpublished and author is no more notable now than she was four days ago. Quotes about the book from celebrities are irrelevant - the book has still not been published - and serve to make this more of an advert than it was previously. Emeraude 15:13, 9 December 2006 (UTC)

  • Delete. A non-notable author with an unreleased book. I suggest to permanently protect the article if it's recreated again. Michaelas10 (Talk) 15:57, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete - non-notable and Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. Jayden54 16:07, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
    • WP:NOT#CBALL certainly doesn't apply here, as the book was confirmed. Michaelas10 (Talk) 16:12, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
      • I didn't know that, thanks for letting me know. I'm sticking to my vote though, as the notability claim still stays. Jayden54 17:12, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
      • And the book has not yet been published, could be cancelled, and may not be notable even when published. And writing one book does not, in itself, confer notability. Emeraude 17:57, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete article is unsourced and reads like spam.-- danntm T C 23:15, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete - let it hit the charts and then recreate, until then, it's crystalballin'. SkierRMH,07:43, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete - my opinion remains unchangde from the first AFD. BTW, the link in the AFD notice in the article points to the origina AFD. -- Whpq 18:15, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.