Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carolyn Howard-Johnson

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. east.718 at 00:28, December 27, 2007

[edit] Carolyn Howard-Johnson

Carolyn Howard-Johnson (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Non-notability per WP:BIO

The credentials look considerably overstated. Her books that are listed as central to the notability, This is the place and Harkening, are both from Star Publish LLC - i.e. self-published. Red Sky Press Award appears to be extremely obscure, with the majority of hits relating to this book. WordThunder is a personal website. "Woman of the Year in Arts and Entertainment by members of the California Legislature" looks highly obscure and only appears in Google hits for this author [1]. "Pasadena Weekly named her to their list of women of the San Gabrial Valley who make life work" looks a trivial credit in a regional newspaper. The Military Writers Society of America looks a fairly obscure organisation. USA Book News seems to be a small company, and The Compulsive Reader is a personal website. The Irwin Award is not for the quality of the book, but awarded by a promotional organisation, the BPSC, for members who conduct the best sales/promotional campaign [2].

There also appears to be a potential WP:COI: Googling the subject and article creator together [3] finds a number of mutually promotional review and link exchanges. Gordonofcartoon (talk) 20:25, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

  • Delete per nom. STORMTRACKER 94 17:17, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom. From my Google search, all of the content in the article appears to be factual, but I doubt that truly reliable sources can be found to verify much of it. --lifebaka (Talk - Contribs) 20:35, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
It's not that is isn't factual: it's just that awards and credits from such small outfits don't come up to WP:BIO's test of "significant recognized awards or honors" or "significant critical attention". Gordonofcartoon (talk) 12:43, 22 December 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.