Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Caroline Doggart

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. — CharlotteWebb 05:44, 27 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Caroline Doggart

Was tagged for speedy A7, but seems to assert notability. Possibly not notable anyway. N Shar 21:23, 20 February 2007 (UTC) Amendments made to confirm notability User:oxford2008

• Keep Good case made that subject is notable. Tax Havens and their Uses a seminal book in its field, and Doggart's contributions to both the Montessori Institute and the World Bank renowned. Contribution seems to be well substantiated. User:IsaacNewton7
• Comment. User's second edit. --N Shar 23:25, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
• Keep Created and nominated for deletion all in one day? Please allow the original creator at least seven days to flesh out the article. Not all of us can sit down and manifest an entirely substantiated and referenced article in one sitting. --Ozgod 05:32, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
• Strong Keep Well researched and referenced article on a notable character. References check out, and have been supplemented since it was nominated for deletion. User:Cameron2000--Cameron2000 20:48, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
• Comment. Hello N Shar. Not sure what you mean about my 'second edit.' Only one comment made so far, I believe. Meantime, I agree that contribution seems more fleshed out now. Do you still have specific reservations on this entry?--Isaacnewton7 21:58, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
• Strong keep plenty of refs. Needs reformating a bit but I can't see the problem at all. NBeale 23:00, 26 February 2007 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached
 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — CharlotteWebb 00:31, 27 February 2007 (UTC)

• Strong Keep this looks like a notable person, and the article seems to fit all the requirements for an article to exist. Mermaid from the Baltic Sea 01:04, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
• Comment. The article is a lot better now. We can close the discussion. --N Shar (talk • contribs) 01:16, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
• Speedy Keep No more dicussion is needed. Do we really have to wait another 5 days?--Dacium 01:20, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
• Keep. -- Librarianofages 01:24, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
• Speedy Keep WP:SNOW - ElbridgeGerry t c block 03:02, 27 February 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.