Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Caroline Crocker

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. – ABCD^e✉ 02:15, 15 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Caroline Crocker

Doesn't appear to meet WP:BIO; a couple of minor human-interest profiles hardly meets the "100-year test". Also has zero internal wikilinks. Aaron 03:44, 8 February 2006 (UTC)

• Comment: I originally put a {{PROD}} tag on this; it was removed without any improvements being made to the article, so I'm listing it here per WP:PROD. --Aaron 04:47, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
• Weak Keep With the whole controversy surrounding intelligent design and evolution, she seems to be making a mark on the debate. --† Ðy§ep§ion † 04:01, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. One article in the *W* section of The Washington Post and a *callout box inside another article* in Nature don't seem too notable yet. (If she does reach that point, no prejudice against recreating.) --Kinu 06:01, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete non-notable minor creationist. Fails the 100 second test, let alone the 100 year test. I've forgotten her name already, in fact. Just zis  Guy, you know? ^[T]/_[C] 13:48, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete nn. Most google hits for that name have nothing to do with this person. Elfguy 13:53, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
• Keep, gets attention within the controversy. Kappa 15:51, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete - doesn't seem to have had any more press coverage than I've ever had, and I know I don't merit an article. Google hits are few and far between. —Whouk (talk) 16:11, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, notability is too minor to meric an article under WP:BIO in my opinion. Maybe a mention under Intelligent Design would be appropriate.--Isotope23 18:13, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete non-notable. -- Death Eater Dan 20:00, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as nn Dustimagic *\o/* ^{(talk/contribs)} *\o/* 22:13, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
• Comment Is she a leader in the debate or just one of many who has taken sides? Is the fact that she has taken what some would consider the less likely side notable? As to the 100-year test, we have not followed that in any real way. 100 years from now, nearly every person whose biography appears in Wikipedia will be forgotten by nearly all except real trivia hounds and at least half even by such hounds. Carlossuarez46 23:53, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. FloNight 03:33, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom --Angelo 04:13, 9 February 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.