Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carniphobe

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 03:49, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Carniphobe

Carniphobe (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

I cannot verify the supposed originator of this word. Is it a neologism? Cybergoth 05:03, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

• Delete. Non-notable neologism; google searches for "carniphobe" and "carnophobe" turn up few results and no good sources. --Akhilleus (talk) 05:40, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
• Delete neoglism that is plainly not in common usage. i kan reed 05:51, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Non-notable neologism. If deletion doesn't meet consensu, merge to author's page. --Gwern (contribs) 05:53 14 February 2007 (GMT) 05:53, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per the School rule Fundamental Dan 20:22, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
• Delete - Wiki isn't a dictionary. At best it would need to be "Carniphobia", as you don't have articles about a "Vegetarian", but "Vegitarianism". Such trivial information would better be served, if at all, on the "trademarker's" article. Is Jeremy Eckhart even a real writer? I searched out on Amazon and turned up nothing. It could be the editor is the individual who "coined" the term.  BIGNOLE   (Question?)  (What I do)  21:25, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. Undocumented neologism. WMMartin 15:05, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.