Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carnage Blender

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 08:34, 25 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Carnage Blender

Carnage Blender (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

Non-notable web game, no references or write-ups other than listings on MMORPG collection sites Delete Steve (Slf67) talk 03:02, 19 December 2006 (UTC)

I am also nominating the following related page because it is a redirect to the above

  • Carnage Blender 2
  • Comment: (and abstaining) There seems to be a number of reviews of the game around (on download sites). Is this enough to pass WP:GAMES? Chovain 04:38, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
Only if they're from professional reviewers. - Mgm|(talk) 10:48, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete - alexa = 471,445 [1]. That's way too high for a notable MMORPG. MER-C 04:51, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete per above. ŞρІϊţ ۞ ĨήƒϊήίтҰ (тąιк|соήтяївѕ) 05:18, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. Alexa indicates this lacks a large number of visitors. No reliable sources either. Seeing as MMORPG games are one in a million, this one doesn't appear to break the mold in any way either. - Mgm|(talk) 10:48, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete - doesn't pass WP:V or WP:GAMES, and Google doesn't provide any of reliable sources. Jayden54 17:27, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete, fails WP:GAMES -Advanced 17:37, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete Both as insufficiently notable. No non-trivial coverage by reliable, third-party published sources. -- Satori Son 19:50, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete per V & GAMES, low traffic & non-notablity even in gaming world. SkierRMH 22:17, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete both No sources given, fails WP:V. Low amount of traffic considering that it's being given away, lacks notability. QuagmireDog 22:39, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Note: This debate has been added to the list of CVG deletions. Koweja 00:31, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete fails notability standards. Koweja 00:31, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete per above.OriginalJunglist 00:56, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete - Another non-notable free online MMORPG, another AfD. The Kinslayer 11:13, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete reads like an ad FirefoxMan 16:58, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.