Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carlos Olivero

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. No source. No evidence of notability, being a boyband member doesn't cut it. PeaceNT (talk) 15:42, 6 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Carlos Olivero

Carlos Olivero (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Little content, nothing of any encyclopedic interest. American Patriot 1776 (talk) 06:14, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

  • Weak Keep, seems to be covered in trashy gossip magazines: [1], which would indicate he's notable. Lankiveil (talk) 06:38, 1 January 2008 (UTC).
  • Keep: Per WP:MUSIC, there's no grounds whatsoever for failing anyone in a band as notable as Menudo, however much its membership frequently shifts.  RGTraynor  08:39, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete - As American Patriot 1776 pointed out, little content and no encyclopedic interest. In addition, this reeks of original research, or alternatively may have been ripped from another web-site. In the absence of anyone willing to rewrite this to a decent standard, I say delete. Alloranleon (talk) 12:04, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete - He isn't really notable, I think you could just have a small bio about him on the band's article. Hatmatbbat10 (talk) 23:46, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
  • Keep - He isn't notable right now , but in some time he might be on the news all the time like Lindsay Lohan and Britney Spears .Lilgunner94 (talk) 5:57, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. —Rigadoun (talk) 07:14, 3 January 2008 (UTC)

Delete - this article sucks. tbone (talk) 06:37, 6 January 2008 (UTC)


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.