The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. Agree that userfying is probably futile. Mackensen(talk) 04:43, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
Vanity page, reads like a press release. cholmes75 (chit chat) 22:52, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
Userfy and delete as nn vanity. -- Kicking222 23:03, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
delete Carlholden's only contribution was this page. No reason to permit this kind of vanity article. jbolden1517Talk 01:40, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
Delete, seeing as it's his only contribution userfying it would be futile. Stifle (talk) 15:30, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.