Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Caritas Hospital
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Keep per WP:SNOW, possibly a WP:POINT too. Non-admin closure. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 20:00, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Caritas Hospital
I hearby nominate Caritas Hospital atleast due to the following reasons
Tinucherian (talk) 11:00, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
- Speedy Keep- bad faith nomination by User:Tinucherian. details are here. User:Tinucherian is the author of Pakalomattom Ayrookuzhiyil (listed below) which I’d nominated AfD. Therefore he nominated pages which I’d involved in editing. All properly referenced articles. User:Tinucherian, you requested to read WP:ABF. Thanks. --Avinesh Jose T 11:18, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
- Keep I again see no advertising or soapboxing here. VivioFateFan (Talk, Sandbox) 12:02, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
- Very weak keep - The hospital's website looks legit, but I'd like to see some more independant sources. Another issue is that "Caritas Hospital" seems to be the name of several hospitals throughout the world, maybe a disambig page would be needed. I just finished cleaning up the page, removing POV violations, removing redundant info for hospitals, and generally improving per the MOS.Gwynand (talk) 14:07, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
- Keep While not every hospital is notable, a research hospital is noteworthy, as is a teaching hospital. Caritas, being synonymous with charity, is a common name for hospitals, like St. Luke, Methodist, Good Samaritan, etc., and I agree that the title should be moved to something like Mandsford (talk) 14:16, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
- Keep sounds like a large important regional hospital and a research centre. Pollytyred (talk) 15:52, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.