Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carey Young (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Carioca 06:43, 23 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Carey Young

Carey Young (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Delete. As per WP:NPOV, WP:RS --Endless Dan 18:20, 17 September 2007 (UTC)

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletions. —David Eppstein 05:48, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
• Keep. She has a work in the Tate [1], a review in ArtForum International [2], and is the subject of a BBC news story [3].--Ethicoaestheticist 19:35, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
• Keep. Sufficient notability is evident in the current version of the article. One thing though is that the demonstration of notability has left a badly-structured article which needs pruning/restructuring if it survives. AllyD 21:22, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
• Keep. Major exhibits, media attention. I moved some parts of the article text around, but as AllyD says, it could use more editing: particularly, a stronger connection should be made between the text of the article and its references. —David Eppstein 03:01, 21 September 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.