Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Care2

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. Rlevse 01:10, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Care2

Care2 (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

I don't believe this breaks the threshold for notability per WP:WEB. The sources and links given are self-referential except for one review of a photo-sharing service provided by the site. WP:WEB says sources must be multiple and non-trivial. RJASE1 Talk 23:59, 6 March 2007 (UTC)

I think the criteria may not be applicable here, or for similar services. If the number of participants can be confirmed, I think this is sufficient for notability. Time we recognized reality about web services in general. DGG 09:31, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep - they quote nearly 7 million members. This makes it notable. Some independent references should be added Peter Campbell 12:32, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
  • Weak keep. Notable enough as they are the group behind several popular internet "activist" sites, but needs independent sources. Dragomiloff 23:17, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep. A number of Google News references for the group. Also, despite WP:BIGNUMBER, which I agree with in principle, 7 million is a large enough number to confer notability. If all else fails (although I don't think this is the case here), WP:IAR should cover this: the inclusion of an organisation with a membership of 7 million is certainly beneficial to the building of an encyclopedia. I will try to improve the article with independent references by the close of the AFD, but can make no promises (as the close-date is in 14 hours). If closed as keep, I will still try to improve it with sources. -- Black Falcon 09:44, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.