Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Caramel (porn star)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete --JForget 00:42, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Caramel (porn star)

Caramel (porn star) (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Can't figure out her notability. Tag set since October 2007. Vinh1313 (talk) 09:32, 3 January 2008 (UTC)

• Speedy delete per CSD A7. Most pornographic actors fail even under the old WP:PORNBIO. Time to clean house TheBilly (talk) 09:44, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 10:21, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
• Delete, not a notable actor. Lankiveil (talk) 10:42, 3 January 2008 (UTC).
• Delete, coverage appears to be trivial, no awards.--h i s ^{s p a c e} _{r e s e a r c h} 12:05, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
• Delete per HisSpaceResearch. Redfarmer (talk) 12:48, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
• Delete Not notable. TGreenburgPR (talk) 16:53, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
• Keep per the old WP:PORNBIO. It set a minimum of 100 films. 150 films is well above that criteria. Vegaswikian (talk) 21:43, 7 January 2008 (UTC)

• The old WP:PORNBIO guideline rejected the X-number-of-films test in early 2007. It is too easy to run up a porn film count. WP:BIO is working consensus now, and it is easier on porn stars than WP:PORNBIO was. • Gene93k (talk) 23:20, 7 January 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.