Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Captain Oats

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Prodded by nominator, who doesn't think this is worth having a 5-day discussion over.. riana_dzasta 13:26, 14 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Captain Oats

Captain Oats (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

Probably qualifies for speedying under A7, but I just want to err on the side of caution. Hardly notable enough for its own article. riana_dzasta 11:37, 14 December 2006 (UTC)

• Delete - fancruft of the highest order. Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information. Should have been prodded. MER-C 11:40, 14 December 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.