Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Capitolo Otto/Archive

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. --Rhobite 22:00, Mar 5, 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Capitolo Otto

Patent nonsense. Talk page has a student confirming that he's heard of it; that's it. Absent published external verification, this should be deleted. jdb ❋ (talk) 03:43, 21 Feb 2005 (UTC)

• Delete. Secret society cruft. jni 14:12, 21 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. Aren't all but a few of these societies impossible to prove? This one seems as credible as any other. AppleTop 12:12, 22 Feb 2005 (UTC)
  • Yes; that's rather the problem. Delete. --TenOfAllTrades | Talk 19:04, 23 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. It's not a secret society if everybody's heard of it. Not a notable conspiracy theory. Radiant! 13:13, Feb 23, 2005 (UTC)
• Unconfirmed claims at best, patent nonsense at worst. Delete. - Mike Rosoft 13:18, 21 Feb 2005 (UTC)
  • Restoring my vote, which has been "accidentally" deleted by AppleTop. - Mike Rosoft 17:19, 23 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, not notable. Or did they just make me say that to preserve their secrecy? Who can tell? - TB 13:10, 2005 Feb 25 (UTC)
• Delete as probable hoax (some of it is almost certainly hoax or such), unless solid reference provided. -- Jmabel | Talk 05:01, Feb 26, 2005 (UTC)
• Keep It's a real society; I know that much. 05:01, Mar 1, 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.