Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Capital Area Transit (Raleigh)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Mangojuice^talk 12:34, 20 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Capital Area Transit (Raleigh)

When we discussed the Sidney bus routes the concensus was that bus timetables are not appropriate for WP. The CAT system is already covered in the Raleigh, North Carolina article and I have added the few additional facts. All that is left is timetables and fares. Delete. BlueValour 21:41, 8 July 2006 (UTC)

If the article meets the notability guidelines, then I would recommend that it be kept and expanded. 68.50.203.109 08:00, 9 July 2006 (UTC)

• Obviously should not be deleted - if it duplicates info in the Raleigh article then redirect. --SPUI (T - C) 10:32, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
• Smerge to Raleigh, North Carolina. Stifle (talk) 18:07, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
• WeakKeep. The article needs a big cleanup even if that means it drops down to a stub and the material gets moved from the city article. I dropped the weak after looking at the article a second time. There were no categories listed so some interested editors may not have even know that article was there. I think it should be kept and see how it is improved with the newly added cleanup tag. Vegaswikian 22:04, 13 July 2006 (UTC)

 AFD relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
 Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks, TigerShark 21:18, 14 July 2006 (UTC)

• Weak Keep A regional transit system serving a moderately large city seems notable enough. Major improvement needed. NO objection to BlueValor's suggestion below.--Nick Y. 22:45, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
• Comment - having reflected upon this I now suggest a Delete and redirect to Raleigh, North Carolina. At the moment nearly the entire content would be deleted as non-encyclopaedic (we don't do timetables, fares etc). If someone is moved to write a substantial article it can be broken out again. BlueValour 22:53, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Wikipedia is not a bus schedule. --DarkAudit 23:09, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
• Strong Keep I created the article, and I just made major improvements to it. I basicaly deleted the whole thing and made a new one. I have just added resources to the bottom of the page. Sorry for the trouble. -- User:Mywebsite123400015:41, 18 July 2006
• Weak Keep More than a bus timetable.--Runcorn 21:12, 19 July 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.