Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Capitães do mato

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete WhiteNight ^{T | @ | C} 18:19, 2 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Capitães do mato

Was tagged {{db|empty, since it doesn't even define the subject. I would've moved some to the article of the person named, but there's no article on him and he doesn't exist on google.}} bt User:Bobet. Not WP:CSD so moving here for a vote. Jamie 05:34, 15 December 2005 (UTC)

Delete. Something odd about this article. It reads like a little chunk copyvio'd from somewhere -- no hits on Google but could be from a book. Literate but inconsequential and context-free, like a fragment ripped from Palmares (quilombo), Capitão do mato or Jürgens Reijmbach (should be Jürgens Reijmbach not "Jürgen" apparently). What little info is there certainly doesn't belong under that title, presumably the plural of his job title -- and just possibly a chapter heading in some book? Flapdragon 13:06, 15 December 2005 (UTC)

• Delete, I placed the speedy tag on it, since it provides zero information about the actual subject of the article. Reading that, do you get any idea on what a Capitães do mato is? But since the page's already here, it won't hurt to wait and see if someone can get something useful out of that. - Bobet 01:53, 16 December 2005 (UTC)
• Relisting due to insufficient votes. - Mailer Diablo 13:34, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
• Relisting again due to insufficient votes. — JIP | Talk 15:43, 2 January 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.