Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Capability Bias

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Singularity 00:41, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Capability Bias

Capability Bias (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

Appears to be original research. --Snigbrook ^(talk) 17:07, 27 February 2008 (UTC) --Snigbrook ^(talk) 17:07, 27 February 2008 (UTC)

• Delete - My thoughts exactly. I just tagged the article with OR and notability templates as they are certainly a concern. Wisdom89 _{(T / ^C)} 17:09, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
• Delete as entirely original research; I can't find any reliable sources that use this term. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 17:12, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
• Delete as per nom. --Umrguy42 (talk) 17:29, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
• Delete - per nom. Also, I found nothing for Daryl Clements (except for the basketball player from Detroit). Padillah (talk) 18:47, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
• Delete - concur. Claiming that there is such a thing as the area of Business Excelence (sic) strikes me as a strong indicator that a conflict of interest exists, and that this article is meant to promote a new buzzword for commercial gain. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 15:29, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.