Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Canoga Park Bowl

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. BLANKFAZE | (что??) 21:15, 23 Mar 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Canoga Park Bowl

More CAT:CSD cleanup. This article has had a {delete} tag for several days, but no one's found a case under which to delete it outright. No notability established. Wikipedia is not the yellow pages. Niteowlneils 23:14, 7 Mar 2005 (UTC)

• Delete as per above. JFW | T@lk 02:33, 8 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, not notable, promo. Megan1967 07:18, 8 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, not notable. RickK 07:21, Mar 8, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete for above reasons. jni 09:52, 8 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. Notability is not a criteria for deletion. The Recycling Troll 22:38, 8 Mar 2005 (UTC)
  • Comment: So you're saying that all bowling alleys deserve articles? Wait...of course you do. Forgot who you were for a second, sorry. — Gwalla | Talk 04:53, 11 Mar 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete. Notability is a de facto criterium for deletion, since it has been in widespread use for a long time. Also 'WP is not the yellow pages' is policy. Radiant! 08:41, Mar 9, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. A bowling alley is not encyclopedic. Gamaliel 16:24, 9 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. This is borderline BJAODN. - Lucky 6.9 03:55, 10 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Just a bowling alley. Not notable. — Gwalla | Talk 04:53, 11 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Delete.--Eliezer 09:35, 13 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, not Encyclopedic. Subject is too ephemeral. Kim Bruning 23:24, 13 Mar 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.