Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Canning how-to

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Keep (No consensus). --Ryan Delaney ^talk 18:07, 20 August 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Canning how-to

Belongs in Wikibooks or elsewhere; how-tos don't belong here. --jpgordon∇∆∇∆ 16:39, 10 August 2005 (UTC)

• I don't think this is a subject for VfD; it should just be transwikied to Wikibooks. Ken ^{talk|contribs} 18:02, August 10, 2005 (UTC)
  • Well, maybe, if it were actually anything resembling a complete how-to on canning; the article was started in April 2004, and has barely been touched since; it contains very little useful information. --jpgordon∇∆∇∆ 19:31, 10 August 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, Wikipedia is not a how-to. -Splash 18:56, 10 August 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Wikipedia is not a how-to, and it's not worth the effort to transwiki. --Carnildo 23:02, 10 August 2005 (UTC)
• Transwiki. The cookbook doesn't seem to have a module on canning, and this would make a fine start for one. Contrary to popular belief, there's almost no effort involved in the actual act of transwikiing, just some monotony (which I'll be perfectly happy to deal with myself). The huge backlogs in the {{move to X}} categories are a combination of doubt whether the tagged articles are appropriate for the target projects, and the effort of figuring out what to do with the articles after they've been transwikied. —Cryptic (talk) 23:41, 10 August 2005 (UTC)
• Transwiki. Cryptic said it quite succinctly. — HopeSeekr of xMule (Talk) 15:38, 11 August 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.