Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cannibalistic Gothica
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete Haemo (talk) 04:10, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Cannibalistic Gothica
- Delete. Unreferenced, dubious authenticity, zero Ghits WWGB (talk) 06:56, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
- Delete. Looks like something made up by a 13 year old who watched too many gore films. I mean seriously, a cannibalistic demon vampire cult? It's either an outright hoax or someone forgot to mention the name of the series they were writing a fictional article about. --erachima formerly tjstrf 07:02, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
- Delete I originally saw this article as "canibalists". First I tagged it as unsourced but after doing some research I found nothing for the phrase or for "Cannibalistic Gothica" so I redirected the page to cannibal. Although some of the information in article appears to coincide with the information in the cannibal entry I can't verify anything that makes this a significantly different term from cannibal nor can I find any evidence that the phrase Cannibalistic Gothica has ever been used.--Torchwood Who? (talk) 07:02, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
- Delete, at best a misunderstanding of some fiction, yet I feel the source is closer to record album notes than a book. --Dhartung | Talk 07:10, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
- Delete No sourcing, no useful Google hits for the term, no apparent real-world notability. - Dravecky (talk) 07:59, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
- Delete Creator User:Michael Slater quotes "My source is from eye witnessess." Man... if I could use that as a WP:RS I'd have made alot of articles when I was smoking that stuff years ago!--Pmedema (talk) 16:53, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
- User:Michael Slater and and IP:99.234.235.244 are removing the AfD tags. They have been reverted and warned.--Pmedema (talk) 17:38, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
- Strong Delete The kindest thing I can say about this is unsourced. Edward321 (talk) 04:10, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
- Delete: Fails WP:RS and WP:V. Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 22:07, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.