Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cannabis Assembly
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. --VS talk 22:53, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Cannabis Assembly
This is not a notable assembly by any means, and thus I ask that the article be removed. Delete. Coccyx Bloccyx (talk) 19:28, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
- Keep - this article seems notable; however; I would recommend that third-party reliable sources are added. If they are not added, I might be forced to change my opinion. D.M.N. (talk) 20:53, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
- Conditional keep - I agree with Coccyx-- this seems notable enough, but if it turns out there are no sources for it, then it's not. SeanMD80talk | contribs 23:33, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
- Delete per nom due to lack of third party sources about the subject; no actual evidence of notability. RFerreira (talk) 23:59, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
- Delete without prejudice to re-creation with at least one reliable source as a stub. I did some rather shallow searching and found nothing immediately obvious on-line as a reliable source. My gut says that if the group is notable it will have been addressed in a High Times article at some point - but their archives might well not be searchable on-line (I did not check this); or perhaps there is a report on certain classes of UK non-profits that might be available online or in a UK library that could be used for fact verification. I also checked to see if any articles on Wikipedia link directly to this one. At present, there are no articles that link directly in addition to those that transclude Template:Cannabis resources (CA did, but I removed that cross-reference because this abbreviation is not highlighted in the article itself). --User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 17:20, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.